Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Received wisdom


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete.-- Hús  ö  nd  01:26, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

Received wisdom


Looks like a candidate for Wiktionary to me. Guy (Help!) 16:55, 17 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete as non-notable, probably made up neologism. -- Elar  a  girl  Talk 17:41, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, it's a real term, but this is nothing but a dicdef. Night Gyr (talk/Oy) 17:43, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and fails WP:NOT as wikipedia is not a dictionary. NeoFreak 20:56, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per NeoFreak. Rever e ndG 06:01, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.