Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Recession Proof (House)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to House (season 7). Liz Read! Talk! 07:17, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Recession Proof (House)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Does not appear to be notable. Nothing found in a BEFORE. Tagged for notability since 2011. Only one review found.

PROD removed with "deprod; all House episodes have articles", which is not true. Also, WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is not a valid keep arguement. Donald D23  talk to me  01:22, 7 April 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  02:24, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and United States of America.  Donald D23   talk to me  01:22, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Redirect to House (season 7). BD2412  T 03:03, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment. It's not a valid keep argument, but it's a valid argument against prodding, which is only for uncontroversial deletion. Something which many editors seem to fail to understand. -- Necrothesp (talk) 12:31, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete appears to be a non-notable episode, based on the lack of sourcing in the article and that I can't find any either. Oaktree b (talk) 15:57, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
 * or Redirect is fine as well. Oaktree b (talk) 15:58, 14 April 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.