Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Recipe for Disaster: The Formula That Killed Wall Street


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Stifle (talk) 16:55, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

Recipe for Disaster: The Formula That Killed Wall Street

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

While the conclusions of the article may be noteworthy, the fact that some blogs picked up on it does not really confer notability upon it. Biruitorul Talk 18:39, 12 March 2009 (UTC) 
 * Comment Not totally sure of the reasons for nominating? From what I can make out you are suggesting that if a subject is blogged, it automatically removes any notability? Please consider re-wording the nom for clarity. Jenuk1985  |  Talk  19:06, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
 * No, what I'm saying is that the claim for notability - that the article was blogged - doesn't really make it notable. The external links are all either blogs or opinion pieces. - Biruitorul Talk 19:25, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Probably also fails WP:WEB otherwise known as "Wikipedia is not a web directory".  --Sc straker (talk) 20:22, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, cover stories are not inherently notable and there is already an article about the formula. WillOakland (talk) 20:29, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 00:06, 17 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete Per above. T-95 (talk) 01:54, 17 March 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.