Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Recom (old)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep. --- Deville (Talk) 23:33, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

Recom
NN. Delete __earth (Talk) 16:22, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
 * That's a terrible nomination. Please note that one editor earned significant censure for making such nominations.  If you are going to nominate articles for deletion on grounds of notability, please link to the notability criteria that you are employing, explain how the subject does not satisfy those criteria, and don't use an abbreviation that novices won't understand. I strongly encourage you to improve that nomination. Uncle G 21:18, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. Notable enough. The nomination is very unpersuasive, if not downright invalid. GregorB 18:27, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
 * keep appears notable. Niffweed17, Destroyer of Chickens 03:01, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.