Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reconceptualizing India Studies


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. (WP:NPASR). (Non-administrator closure) NorthAmerica1000 02:02, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

Reconceptualizing India Studies

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

At first blush, this article seems well-referenced with enough sources to justify the notability of its subject. Verifying the references, however, reveals that they don't establish notability. Several discuss the subject of the book and not the book itself. Others are about the author, and a few are the author's work surrounding the book (a lecture explaining the book, for example). The subject, as far as I can tell, fails WP:NBOOK. Mikeblas (talk) 13:08, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:49, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:49, 24 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e deckertalk 16:31, 1 July 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar ♔   18:32, 8 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Comment&mdash;I'll continue working on this later. Most of the citations are to unreliable sources and need to be removed, but I've found at least one review not in the current article that has me leaning toward keep.  Should know one way or the other in 24 hours or so.  Lesser Cartographies (talk) 18:49, 12 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep&mdash;I've removed several of the marginal sources. What remains is sufficient to establish notability, particularly the review in The Hindu and the several academic talks given on the work.  Lesser Cartographies (talk) 09:58, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.