Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reconstructivism


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. ---J.S (T/C/WRE) 16:58, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

Reconstructivism

 * - (View AfD) (View log)

Term "reconstructivism" does not have this meaning in general use. This article is promoting a particular personal opinion and a particular new definition of the term. See "What Wikipedia is not" -- e.g. unpublished original research, self-promotion. [] Theoh 19:26, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak delete. This seems confusing and confused.  It links Christian existential humanism with John Dewey, without giving much of an explanation about what they allegedly share; this seems implausible.  It also attempts to link a rather odd collection of entertainments, from Being John Malkovich to Lion King: The Musical to Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band, without containing much analysis about what they allegedly share or how it relates to the named belief system.  Seems like original research to me as it stands currently. - Smerdis of Tlön 15:50, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, such a mess cannot be probably saved without total rewritting even if it were notable.--Ioannes Pragensis 20:46, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Appears to be, like "Christian existential humanism" which I will put up as Afd as well (as assumedly a strictly personal opinion, which comes to the article being a hoax), an article created by User:Kitoba mainly to promote the personal website "Kitopedia" by Christopher "Kitoba" Sunami, see . Note that forementioned other article (of course) links to 'Reconstructivism'. Suggestion: check out other contributions by the article's creator, look for possible sockpuppets and historically used IPs. — SomeHuman 14 Jan2007 05:47 (UTC)
 * Delete, neologism and self-promo. Dragomiloff 05:17, 15 January 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.