Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Record Bar


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was    Keep. Eluchil404 (talk) 07:43, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

Record Bar

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Declined Speedy (or Contested Prod) &mdash; "Non-notable list."   Vengeance is mine,  saith   the Prime  03:00, 14 Aug 2008 (UTC) 
 * Keep Gone but not forgotten. Still has news archive hits. Still gets Google Book hits. Almost forgot. This is not a list. It is an article about a now defunct music store chain with 150 stores. The links will support this. Yes, it's badly formatted-- someone tried to do a year by year historical. But that merits clean-up, not deletion. If one takes the trouble to go through the google hits, they come away seeing that this was a company that met WP:CORP   Dloh  cierekim  06:13, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment Still gets 16 hits on Galenet's Business and Company Resource Center. (You will need to log in through your library patron access, assuming your library is a subscriber.] Dloh  cierekim  19:42, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. Nomination gives no good reason to delete (it's clearly not a list although possibly formatted like one) and it appears to me that it could be notable.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dpmuk (talk • contribs) 12:43, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep as article needs cleanup, not deletion, and notability is not temporary. - Dravecky (talk) 06:58, 18 August 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.