Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Record Union


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 06:03, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

Record Union

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Delete. Advertorially toned article about a new online music retailing startup, which is based predominantly on primary sources rather than reliable source coverage in real media -- and the couple of references here that do count as reliable sources aren't about Record Union, but merely namedrop Record Union's existence in coverage of Tidal. All of which means WP:CORP has not been passed. Bearcat (talk) 21:51, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 10:59, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 10:59, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 10:59, 27 August 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:04, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:PROMO; article exists solely to promote the business, and has been created and edited by a single purpose account Special:Contributions/Sritz19, so potential for on-going COI exists. Nominator's analysis of sources is compelling, and I'm not finding anything better. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:18, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:20, 2 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete as it stands per nom and above - David Gerard (talk) 13:00, 2 September 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.