Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Recovery of Chittorgarh (1321)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 05:37, 24 March 2024 (UTC)

Recovery of Chittorgarh (1321)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Can't see any WP:RS explicitly records the event as "Recovery of Chittorgarh". Many forts has been captured and recaptured several times in the military history. Seperate articles are made whenever they are notable. As seems, the article is poorly written, taken the reference from broken lines from the sources. No in-depth description about this in any of the reliable sources. Fails GNG, and the title is a fabricated one. Imperial [AFCND]  11:45, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Rajasthan-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 13:27, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 13:27, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 13:27, 17 March 2024 (UTC)


 * How could you call a historical battle fabricated? It was a turning point in history of Mewar State. I don't think it's Necessary to remove the article Sinsilal (talk) 13:45, 17 March 2024 (UTC)


 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History and Military.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  14:17, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete. Sources are very poor and unreliable. The battle segment has source by a writer who was a pilot and that too does not draw any parallel with any battle. Fails WP:HISTRS, WP:V and WP:GNG. RangersRus (talk) 14:57, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
 * ok I'm moving the article to draft again and I would add more sources and extend the article Sinsilal (talk) 04:33, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Sinsilal, do not move an article being discussed at an AFD to Draft space nor remove the AFD tag. If you persist, you could lose your editing privileges for disruptive editing. Liz Read! Talk! 06:46, 18 March 2024 (UTC)

- The creator of this article is found to be a sock of a common POV pusher.-- Imperial [AFCND]  12:50, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete – fails notability guidelines with no reliable sources on Gbooks and Scholar. Toadette  ( Let's discuss together! ) 19:53, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete. One source cannot be found, another does not entirely support the narrative, such as it is, the others are difficult to search for lack of page numbers. Brief, poorly written. Written by sock of a POV pusher, unreliable. I agree with the previous commentators. Donner60 (talk) 04:54, 24 March 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.