Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Recstacy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   SOFT DELETE. Because of low participation in this discussion will treat the nomination as an expired proposed deletion, with the understanding that anyone who contests the deletion may request undeletion for any reason J04n(talk page) 17:27, 28 February 2013 (UTC)

Recstacy

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Does not seem to meet WP:Notability (events), and is not supported in RS so far (news, news archive, books, scholarly). It may be a largish event, and it may attract some names, but they haven't written about it, AFAIK. This may belong in a list of festivals, instead of in a standalone article. Lexein (talk) 00:37, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment: most links in google search are from youtube; using -youtube, number of results came down from 13000 to 8000. Got a single mention in The Telegraph, India and a single one in website of Times of India. Not much coverage in newspapers on this fest yet.--GDibyendu (talk) 14:59, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
 * (late reply) Hrmph. I'm disliking Google for not including the above two results in my searches. Sheesh. --Lexein (talk) 00:21, 22 February 2013 (UTC)
 * searched using 'site' parameter of google search: "Recstacy site:indiatimes.com", "Recstacy site:telegraphindia.com". Now, both showing 2 results each.--GDibyendu (talk) 05:28, 22 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Ah. Good google-fu! --Lexein (talk) 05:37, 22 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:00, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:00, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:01, 19 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Theopolisme   ( talk )  22:54, 21 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete. It has a pretty logo but the only link is for the official website. Seems entirely non-notable. MezzoMezzo (talk) 10:15, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.