Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rectifi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep with leave to speedy renominate if someone wishes to discuss the subject's notability. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:25, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

Rectifi

 * - (|View AfD) (View log)

The website is closed. Following the link we are taken to a webpage informing users that Rectifi no longer exists. It does not seem something which needs to be kept. Any other oppinions? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Azthral (talk • contribs) 2010/04/24 18:05:20
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 10:34, 26 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep. Once notable, always notable. And this BBC article establishes that it was once notable. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 14:24, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:31, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.