Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rectifi (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. ✗ plicit  05:49, 15 December 2023 (UTC)

Rectifi
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Only cites two sources, one of which is its website. Very little coverage available online DirtyHarry991 (talk) 06:44, 5 December 2023 (UTC) Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  07:13, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Computing and Internet. DirtyHarry991 (talk) 06:44, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Websites and England.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  12:06, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete I'm not seeing much beyond routine listings and passing mentions. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 15:20, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete – It does not appear to have any notability Svartner (talk) 04:45, 15 December 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.