Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Recuérdame


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. Michig (talk) 09:33, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

Recuérdame

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unneeded dab page, per WP:TWODABS ©   Tb hotch ™ (en-2.5). 07:02, 7 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep, this now has three entries. Boleyn (talk) 09:56, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. North America1000 11:06, 7 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep, this appears to be a relatively common title for Spanish songs . I've added a few of the more prominent, there are many others (not all might have existing mentions in articles at this time). older ≠ wiser 11:31, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep per the above comments. Erick (talk) 16:48, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:TWODABS; unnecessary page when there are only two notable entries and one is the primary topic. Snuggums (talk / edits) 20:29, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment, you obviously have little understanding of MOS:D. Entries don't need an article (or, indeed, to be notable) to be a valid entry, se MOS:DABMENTION and MOS:DABRL. Boleyn (talk) 20:36, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
 * For an overall page with a bunch of notable entries, perhaps not, but WP:TWODABS says having a DAB page is not needed when only two notable entries exist with a primary topic since the primary topic can simply have a referral note linking to the other notable entry. Snuggums (talk / edits) 20:43, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
 * no, you're misquoting WP:TWODABS. It says "If there are only two topics to which a given title might refer, and one is the primary topic ...". Not "only two notable entries ...". This dab page has a bunch of appropriate entries and is a valid dab page. Pam  D  21:18, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
 * I was basically paraphrasing, and am certain that "topics" in that instance excludes subjects not notable enough for own articles Snuggums (<b style="color:#454545">talk</b> / <b style="color:#454545">edits</b>) 21:22, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
 * No, the term "topics" was used deliberately rather than "articles" precisely because of such misinterpretations. older ≠ wiser 22:18, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
 * , your 'certainty' means you can't have read the links I directed you to, as per MOS:DABMENTION: If a topic does not have an article of its own, but is mentioned within another article, then a link to that article should be included. Boleyn (talk) 08:25, 8 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep: valid dab page with several useful entries. Possibly move the album to primary topic and the dab page to Recuérdame (disambiguation)  Pam  D  21:18, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment I considered 's suggestion too, but the album with an article looks like it is probably non-notable; a WP:RM may occur at some point but I don't think it's a cut-and-dry primary topic. Boleyn (talk) 17:42, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment. I was about to withdrawn it, but I see Snuggums supported it. Can it still be closed per either Snow/withdrawn by nom? ©   Tb hotch ™ (en-2.5). 23:52, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Not as long as there's an outstanding Delete !vote. ? Sam Sailor Talk! 20:36, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
 * On the fence. Recuérdame (Yolandita Monge album) is currently tagged as unreferenced and as potentially lacking notability. Recuérdame (La 5ª Estación song) is referenced but is currently just a stub (which is not enough for songs to have a separate article per WP:Notability (music)). If either one of these fail notability, I'd say delete since it would be pointless to have a DAB with only one notable topic or no notable topics at all. <b style="color:#454545">Snuggums</b> (<b style="color:#454545">talk</b> / <b style="color:#454545">edits</b>) 21:34, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Notability is not currently a consideration for disambiguation. The only consideration is ambiguity of topics (not articles) within Wikipedia. older ≠ wiser 00:39, 11 November 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.