Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Recycled Building Materials


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Brandon (talk) 07:51, 26 November 2009 (UTC)

Recycled Building Materials

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Original research. Essay. Not an encyclopedia article. Wuh Wuz  Dat  07:53, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete. Not an encyclopedia article in the least. JakeZ (talk) 08:05, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. The article needs to be cleaned up, but this Google News archive search turns up many references in reliable sources for "reuse of building materials". -- Eastmain (talk) 08:09, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete "Resue of building materials" might belong in the Recycling article, or the like, but the article in question is just an essay (notice the section "Conclusion?"). Angryapathy (talk) 16:30, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: An essay. Joe Chill (talk) 00:23, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment. I removed the conclusion, It's less of an essay now. – Eastmain (talk) 01:06, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Still looks like an essay. Joe Chill (talk) 01:07, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Indeed it does. Delete  Bradjamesbrown (talk) 05:44, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Essay. Glass  Cobra  01:32, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.