Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Recycling Debate


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 05:13, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

Recycling Debate

 * — (View AfD)

poorly written rehash of ideas already discussed on the Recycling page Daniel J. Leivick 03:06, 4 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete - This article is an eyesore and is remarkably unencyclopedic. Babcockd 04:04, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete. Not encyclopedic, more like a rant, and a horrible-looking one at that. It would only be worse if the font were changed to Comic Sans. Realkyhick 06:31, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete per nom. Doesn't really come under any CSD criterion, though. Tevildo
 * Delete per above. Fails every policy in the book, except WP:N. MER-C 06:52, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong delete A poorly written article that is unneeded. --Matth e w UND (talk) 07:01, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, someone's personal rant. J I P  | Talk 10:01, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete it is utter non-sense. TSO1D 15:43, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom SUBWAYguy 20:50, 4 January 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.