Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Recyling plastic and how it affects the economy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete per white fluffy items descending from the sky. No doubt about this one, I think. Black Kite 17:42, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Recyling plastic and how it affects the economy

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Essay about how to recycle, but contains no encyclopaedic information. PeterSymonds | talk  06:00, 1 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Strong delete Aside from the obvious statement that this is an original research-y essay, Wikipedia is not a how-to guide. While this class has brought us several decent articles, this needs to go. B figura  (talk) 06:12, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Wikipedia is not a how-to. Stifle (talk) 08:27, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete WP:OR.   Esradekan Gibb    "Talk" 09:18, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per above Jasynnash2 (talk) 09:53, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete poor repetition of existing article. Czolgolz (talk) 12:45, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
 * An environmentally friendly Delete - At least no trees were cut down to create this article. Ecoleetage (talk) 12:57, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment However, a large number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced :) -- B figura (talk) 16:33, 1 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete Hopeless OR essay filled with stuff like "We really need to keep our environment a priority so that way we will not loose all that we have." Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  16:26, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete then delete again. Trachys (talk) 16:45, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete I tried to edit this article into a manner fit for merging into Recycling plastic. I was even prepared to clean up the unencyclopedic second-person style of writing. But after trimming all the extraneous parts, there was nothing salvageable left. --Rifleman 82 (talk) 17:32, 1 May 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.