Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RedAwning Group


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  09:54, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

RedAwning Group

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing General notability guideline and the more detailed Notability (companies) requirement. Coverage is either in passing, or comes from press releases and their reprints/rewrites/WP:ROUTINE start up news. Yet another WP:CORPSPAM created by an undisclosed paid for editor. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 08:47, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 20:32, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 20:32, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 20:32, 18 December 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete: does not meet WP:NCORP; significant RS coverage not found -- what comes up is passing mentions, routine notices and / or WP:SPIP. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:57, 21 December 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.