Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RedBoxBlue


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 05:50, 6 November 2022 (UTC)

RedBoxBlue

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails notability criteria for bands. No significant coverage, nor notable songs or albums.  Ploni &#128172; 16:17, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians, Music, United Kingdom,  and England.   Ploni &#128172; 16:17, 29 October 2022 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 20:33, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep Significant coverage present in article at time of nomination. The group (and its leader)'s odd, modern means of rise in the music industry was the subject of sufficient coverage to justify an article. Chubbles (talk) 17:40, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep. Altho they do fail the usual criteria for notability for bands, there are two reasons to consider them notable. The sources are pretty solid.TheLongTone (talk) 15:07, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Keep The Independent, the BBC and Guardian are solid sources. That's GNG folks. Oaktree b (talk) 22:46, 5 November 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.