Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Red Air Flight 203


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Doczilla @SUPERHEROLOGIST 19:35, 29 June 2022 (UTC)

Red Air Flight 203

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

WP:NOTNEWS. Runway excursions, landing gear collapses are very common. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 09:42, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events, Aviation, Transportation,  and Florida. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 09:42, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep Not a common runway overran as the landing gear and nose collapse caused an engine to explode and a large fire which consumed most of the right wing and writing off the airframe. The incident also just recently occurred so it’s too soon to determine the causes and it’s aftermath. ThePoi (talk) 10:28, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Accident, nothing too notable. No external coverage. Oaktree b (talk) 16:24, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep: Passes WP:AIRCRASH. Passenger plane incidents that result in the entire loss of the plane are much rarer than runway excursions and landing gear collapses.--66.76.243.26 (talk) 16:56, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep: Major accident that took place that resulted in the plane catching on fire and it’s belly resting on the ground. Just because no one died, does not mean it’s does not meet the criteria for notability, there is several articles about plane crashes on Wikipedia with zero causalities reported. BigRed606 (talk) 17:06, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep: Not only are major aircraft hull losses at major international airports remarkably rare as mentioned above, this incident has been covered extensively by multiple reputable aviation sources and major U.S. news networks. Additional sources reflecting this coverage have been added to the main article. This incident shut down a runway at a major U.S. airport that is not only incredibly busy but also a hub for American Airlines, among the biggest if not the biggest airline in the world. This is quite a unique and notable incident. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Slowtationjet (talk • contribs) 17:35, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep, I think this nomination may have been a litle premature. It does now seem to be getting picked up by multiple reliable sources and more details of the circumstances of the accident are emerging. Passes WP:GNG now. Buttons0603 (talk) 17:51, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep, this is a breaking news event of an accident that may be one of the more prominent American aviation accidents of the last few years. I believe nominating it for deletion is uncalled for, especially as the information is still coming in. - Navarre0107 (talk) 21:41, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:RAPID. Don't rush to delete articles. HouseBlastertalk 22:20, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep, This incident is similar to Tibet Airlines Flight 9833 which also made a runway excursion and caught on fire. If Red Air Flight 203 is being considered to be deleted, why hasn't Tibet Airlines Flight 9833 had a deletion consideration too? GDFilbert (talk) 22:28, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep. It is notable. Wjfox2005 (talk) 09:35, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep pass GNG. And also suggest change title to RED Air. Air Astana 1388 (talk) 13:02, 23 June 2022 (UTC)


 * Keep per 66.76.243.26. Death tolls aren't a measurement of notability. Dunutubble (talk) (Contributions) 15:04, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep - The aircraft involved was an MD-80 variant, which is rarely commercial airlines fly it now a days.  Could possibly be the last MD-80 accident with a commercial airline.   Aceing_Winter_Snows_Harsh_Cold (talk) 03:25, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep - JulTrio (talk) 00:32, 28 June 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.