Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Red Bull Art of Motion


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Tone 17:14, 17 December 2011 (UTC)

Red Bull Art of Motion

 * – ( View AfD View log )

non notable event, no coverage, article claims that parkour is in the olympics. Gaijin42 (talk) 16:34, 2 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 19:18, 2 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete. Does not seem notable, and definite factual errors (free running in the olympics?) Millermk90 (talk) 05:00, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sprinting faster (talk) 15:51, 9 December 2011 (UTC)




 * I'm not sure how much more clear unanimous can be. But perhaps you meant larger? :) Gaijin42 (talk) 16:09, 9 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep (as a stub for now) - The BBC article here: and the Mesquite Citizen Journal here:  would seem to indicate notability for this event in the world of free-running/parkour.  I've removed the factual errors and hope that someone else can expand this stub in the future.--Stvfetterly (talk) 19:43, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep - I dropped past it to stub-sort it, but found another WP:RS and formatted the BBC ref properly. Appears to be notable. Pam  D  23:47, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep per Stvfetterly. --Legis (talk - contribs) 05:34, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep I know it doesn't warrant an official factor, but I feel it just needs stating, that there are 2 need-for category tags related to this article (sports and France). I'm not basing my vote on this fact; I feel it's just a relevant item of information.  Do with it what you like.  (You can view the details on the main  parkour discussion page.  The boxes say France, where parkour originated, is on high-importance aim to improve, and sports is a mid-importance project to improve.) Squish7 (talk) 18:48, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
 * "sigh, moot, because the article is likely to be kept at this point - but : because france, sports, and parkour are all good subjects, which can be expanded on does not mean that this particular article is a good expansion - there are standards. Should we have an article about each middle school soccer game that happened in france?  I (and at least one other editor) thought this article did not meet those standards at the time. Either we are likely to be proven wrong, or the article has subsequently been sufficiently improved. Either way, don't be offended because I decided to gather consensusGaijin42 (talk) 19:48, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Could someone clarify how the final decision is made? Like it seems there are enough votes to take down the deletion tag...(?)  Not bickering, just want to know the process for reference, thanks Squish7 (talk) 20:02, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The standard process is that an admin reviews this process after 7 days - this one was relisted, so it should go for 14 days from the time of my initial submit (we are currently 11 in ). They will occasionally close one early. you can read more here Articles_for_deletion Gaijin42 (talk) 20:04, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.