Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Red Cafe


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep.  MBisanz  talk 13:37, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

Red Cafe

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable rapper; released one non-hit indie label mixtape and no hit singles. Fails WP:MUSIC. Prod removed without comment. — Hello, Control Hello, Tony  02:20, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.   — Hello, Control  Hello, Tony  02:22, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:10, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
 * delete no references show notability. Duffbeerforme (talk) 19:10, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep. As a minimum before nominating an article on a musical artist/band for deletion, searches should be carried out on Google, Google News, and Allmusic. Allmusic has a substantial biography and other coverage was easily found. The article passes WP:MUSIC, most importantly on significant coverage. --Michig (talk) 09:33, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
 * 'Keep. +1 ^ Hello Control seems to think everything without sourced material should be deleted on the spot. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.129.160.55 (talk) 21:37, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
 * - I don't know what to think someone give me a reason why this should be delted or kept because first of all it is a sloppy article and the artist is not that notable but he does have a single that is played consistently on MTV called Paper Touchin (Remix) so for those of you who want to keep his article my god at least make an effort on mentioning his single if you want to keep it so bad.Xx1994xx (talk) —Preceding undated comment was added at 01:20, 10 November 2008 (UTC).
 * If he's notable according to WP:MUSIC it should be kept, irrespective of whether or not the article is 'sloppy'.--Michig (talk) 07:29, 10 November 2008 (UTC)


 * -I don't find him that notable and he seems almost unknown with albums that an underground rap fan wouldn't even know about.Xx1994xx (talk) —Preceding undated comment was added at 23:15, 10 November 2008 (UTC).
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:27, 11 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 03:25, 16 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep - Haven't read any clear grounds for deletion. According to the article, the nomination and the support of deletion on grounds of failing WP:Music are in contrast to the article. Regardless of what the article says, it does not fail WP:Music outright. Louis Waweru  Talk 03:56, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
 * References added after nom (see this version). — Hello, Control Hello, Tony  10:56, 16 November 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.