Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Red Clay (disambiguation)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Stifle (talk) 16:57, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

Red Clay (disambiguation)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

No entries actually ambiguous. Note previous discussion on Talk. ENeville (talk) 18:46, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
 * While Red Clay Consolidated School District asserts that its topic may be identified as simply "Red Clay", no media citations support this and it seems implausible that one would expect to find this topic so listed in an encyclopedia. ENeville (talk) 18:46, 29 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions.   — Paul Erik  (talk) (contribs) 22:16, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Pointless dab page, lists only partial matches. Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 04:29, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep aside from Red Clay Ramblers, everything else seems appropriate. 76.66.196.229 (talk) 05:33, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak keep. The partial title matches are for the most part consistent with what would typically be included on other disambiguation pages. older ≠ wiser 23:11, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton Tropical  Cyclone  01:59, 4 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep - still a valid dab page as all entries are of the form "Red Clay ****". Thus it is collecting article titles associated with the phrase "Red Clay". B.Wind (talk) 04:21, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep There's no rule against partial matches on dab pages.- Mgm|(talk) 12:37, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep On the grounds above. As a side-note, I have driven across Red Clay Creek numerous times and found that page very interesting and relevant: I think sometimes these loose disambiguation pages are useful/informative for the more curious readers and help people like me stumble across something interesting by accident.  Cazort (talk) 21:50, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Actually I find it helpful in cases were I can't remember the exact name of something or when the full name is especially cumbersome to type or spell. A dab like this isn't just for curious people it makes WP more user friendly. - Mgm|(talk) 09:55, 5 February 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.