Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Red Deer Rebels Hockey Cards


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MelanieN (talk) 23:48, 7 May 2016 (UTC)

Red Deer Rebels Hockey Cards

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article about a junior-league hockey team's own proprietary set of hockey cards, whose only discernible claim of standalone notability as a separate topic in its own right is the fact that a handful of former Rebels went on to play in the National Hockey League later in their careers and thus have old pre-fame cards in this set. The only "source" here is a fan's own self-published card collecting website, with no reliable source coverage in media shown at all. If we need any content about this in Wikipedia at all, one or two properly sourced sentences in Red Deer Rebels is more than enough to cover it. Delete. Bearcat (talk) 22:43, 30 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete No evidence of notability. At best, this could be merged into the article for the team; but even that would need coverage in reliable sources of some sort, which is absent here. Vanamonde93 (talk) 23:14, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 01:35, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 01:35, 1 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete. No notability to speak of. Clarityfiend (talk) 02:09, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - No evidence of notability and may be promotional. Rlendog (talk) 12:50, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Not notable, but could perhaps be mentioned in the team article. Peridon (talk) 11:11, 7 May 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.