Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Red Forman


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (WP:NPASR). North America1000 00:03, 19 March 2016 (UTC)

Red Forman
AfDs for this article: 


 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This fictional character fails to meet WP:GNG and I don't see an applicable SNG where this character would qualify. A cursory search for sources found only two reliable sources, neither of which was in-depth. The article appears to be a lot of fancruft original research. This has been nominated for deletion before. Chris Troutman ( talk ) 13:36, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment. Arguably a notable character, but this article currently has no sources other than a dead link. Perhaps secondary sources discussing the character can be found, but if not, redirect to List of That '70s Show characters. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 03:17, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:06, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:06, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 11:17, 4 March 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Comment. Well, there's  from The A.V. Club and  from Time.  It's not much, but these articles have some info that could be added to the article.  This is absolutely full of original research and definitely needs to be cleaned up if it's kept.  I guess I'd be wiling to vote to keep it if someone could locate more sources.  I've spent a bit of time searching, and I've found little that goes beyond trivial mentions. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 05:44, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 17:46, 11 March 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.