Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Red Light Junkie


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.--Esprit15d • talk • contribs 13:14, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

Red Light Junkie

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Neologism of no notability. No sources, and google hits do not show this usage for this term Jclemens (talk) 04:00, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete unless sourced. In the absence of sources to the contrary, this appears to be a purely local non-notable description of the phenomenon. – iride  scent  04:11, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete This seems very original research to me, not just because of the lack of sources, or the use of words such as "many", but because if it is indeed a colloquialism (or neologism) of limited use (as the article purports) then I doubt such sources would exist at all. Calgary (talk) 04:16, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete At the most this would be a dictionary entry. I notice that the article is about the expression, not about the "red light junkies" themselves. The info, which I am sure is true, should be mentioned in Volunteer firefighter. Steve Dufour (talk) 04:33, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Much of the content of the article is already at Volunteer_firefighter and that which is not already present yet reliably sourcacble--which in my estimation probably does not include the term itself--would indeed be more appropriately included there. Jclemens (talk) 04:40, 15 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:V. Apparently a lot of the material is already present inanother article, too. Happyme22 (talk) 08:23, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:N and WP:RS. Masterpiece2000   ( talk ) 08:25, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Popular culture-related deletion discussions.   --  brew  crewer  (yada, yada) 15:55, 15 June 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.