Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Red Line (1996 film)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure)  Java Hurricane  02:37, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

Red Line (1996 film)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

The article fails WP:NFSOURCES. Hitcher vs. Candyman (talk) 00:52, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 01:05, 1 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Comment: I'm finding sourcing and I get the impression that there's likely more out there, it's just not on the internet. In any case, this has earned one of the nastiest reviews I've ever seen TV Guide make for a film. Normally their reviews are kind of borderline, as they're more synopsis than review, but whomever wrote this wanted to make sure that there was no doubt as to their opinion on the film. I mean, I've never seen them use the phrase "car-wash tramp" before. ReaderofthePack (formerly Tokyogirl79)  (｡◕‿◕｡)  04:44, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Weak keep as per the Austin Chronicle review in the article, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 01:50, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep - the reviews added after the AfD are just about enough to warrant a keep for me Spiderone  09:34, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep - this was a notable film, with a notable cast. Eric (talk) 10:14, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep Per all above keep rationale. Donaldd23 (talk) 17:47, 7 January 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.