Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Red Marble Games


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. KTC (talk) 14:42, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

Red Marble Games

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article topic lacks significant coverage from reliable, independent sources. (?) Apart from its brief part in the Eurogamer article, it had no meaningful content in a video game reliable sources custom Google search—not enough to write an article on the subject. Perhaps it's worth a redirect to one of its games? If someone finds more (non-English and offline) sources, please ping me. czar 18:22, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions.  czar  18:22, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  czar  18:22, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete as I'm not seeing much hope for better improvement here. SwisterTwister   talk  05:39, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Sam Sailor Talk! 02:05, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:11, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:11, 25 October 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 05:15, 26 October 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Wait for a week to take decision
 * Delete lack of good coverage, if I had to choose a redirect, Democracy, since it seems to be the most well-known, but I don't think it's worth much having Rainbow unicorn (talk) 03:42, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Wikienglish123 (talk) 01:50, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - no significant coverage in independent sources per searches.  Onel 5969  TT me 13:51, 3 November 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.