Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Red Orb Entertainment


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect, clearly not enough info out there. Shii (tock) 05:57, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

Red Orb Entertainment

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Unsourced article, prod contested by IP, who solved the "sourcing problem" by adding a link to metacritic and neoseeker (both of which are nothing more than a list of their games). An article that is nothing more than a product list from a defunct company does not meet GNG. MSJapan (talk) 01:01, 27 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:26, 27 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:26, 27 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Merge/Redirect to Brøderbund I see nothing here conferring independent notability. Alessandra Napolitano (talk) 21:27, 27 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:13, 4 December 2011 (UTC)




 * Delete as having insufficient coverage in independent third-party sources. If such sources are integrated into the article, feel free to ping my talk page. Alternatively redirect as above. Stuartyeates (talk) 09:02, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.