Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Red Storm (webtoon)

Red Storm (webtoon)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails significant coverage. The little commentary I found is in this CBR listicle, others are just plot summary and mention in other listicles. Neocorelight (Talk) 02:28, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Comics and animation and Webcomics. Neocorelight (Talk) 02:28, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of South Korea-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  04:24, 8 July 2024 (UTC)


 * Comment: could there be Korean sources we're missing? Not to say it might not be non-notable. Mrfoogles (talk) 08:52, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Who knows? Maybe you can find them? I can't read Korean. Neocorelight (Talk) 09:32, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Per WP:GNG, before you nominate articles for deletion, you really should search in the native language of the topic. As you're the one making the proposal, I'd argue the burden of proof is on you to follow through with it. With machine translation it's really not that hard, as you only need a high-level understanding of what each source says. Almost every day I see deletion nominations like these.
 * That said, I'm leaning delete. I'm a Korean speaker and didn't find much convincing sigcov. 211.43.120.242 (talk) 07:04, 9 July 2024 (UTC)


 * Weak delete – I am not an expert at Korean sources and cannot quite tell you which of these sources are reliable right now, but this is what I'm finding:
 * gameca.com, three paragraphs as part of a list.
 * techm.kr, three paragraphs as part of a list.
 * news.nate.com, listed entry, basically nothing.
 * news.nate.com, listed entry, basically nothing.
 * mk.co.kr, listed entry, basically nothing.
 * yna.co.kr, listed entry, basically nothing.
 * chosun.com, author quote, basically nothing.
 * sisaprime.co.kr, listed entry that is given ridiculously high praise (Google Translate gives me Kakao Webtoon, which has created major action/martial arts/fantasy masterpieces that will leave a lasting mark in webtoon history, such as .. Red Storm. Segye.com might be a copy, extremely similar text)
 * I currently have no idea which of these are reliable, but sourcing is fairly weak either way. If someone can find better sources I haven't found yet, I'd be happy to see them. ~ Maplestrip/Mable ( chat ) 15:59, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Korean here-- of the ones you've listed, the only widespread sources I can see are Nate News, Yonhap News (YNA), and Chosun Ilbo, none of which have coverage focused on said Webtoon. Though the KakaoPage website indicates that there's about 4 million subscribers to the Webtoon, I'd still argue delete here since I can't find any significant coverage that would warrant an article.  MetropolitanIC  (💬&#124;📝) 02:39, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 02:35, 15 July 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 03:23, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
 * weak keep: Coverage in a newspaper from Uganda, doesn't appear to be a "pay to publish" article, I suppose Ugandans watch South Korean online manga-type stories? Oaktree b (talk) 00:52, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
 * or a redirect to Kakao, the publisher? Oaktree b (talk) 00:54, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
 * The Observer.ug article is a coverage of a different comic. Red Storm is only mentioned. The second source is just a single-sentence announcement. Neocorelight (Talk) 01:31, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
 * With this source I would probably support an article on the author, but it doesn't help much for this specific work. A redirect to a listing at Kakao Webtoon would be appropriate, yes. ~ Maplestrip/Mable ( chat ) 06:53, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Oh I saw incorrectly, we do not have a list of Daum/Kakau webtoons. Probably for the best, as the Naver equivalent list is a mess. Deletion still feels like the correct choice. ~ Maplestrip/Mable ( chat ) 06:47, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.