Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Red espresso (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep, withdrawn by nominator. Mister Senseless&trade; (Speak - Contributions) 14:30, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

Red espresso
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Originally tagged as a copyvio, infringing material removed. That being said, this is about a non-notable brand of tea/ coffee substitute. Google turns up mostly advertising, nothing independent, and apparently this was speedied a little over amonth ago as spam. Mister Senseless&trade; (Speak - Contributions) 03:24, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Looks like I didn't do enough of a google news search, a few of these are definately non-trivial. I'll clean up the article/ remove some of the bias. Mister Senseless&trade; (Speak - Contributions) 14:28, 8 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete. Not notable WP:COATRACK for the producer's company. -- brew crewer  (yada, yada) 03:38, 8 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete. "Red Espresso" is apparently the patented name for a method of making rooibos tea, stated here to be the "best" method. The Rooibos article already mentioned "red espresso", and this article doesn't really add any extra information. -- MQ Duck 04:47, 8 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep - The article passes WP:NOTE. I found several reliable sources through googling: NewsObserver, SeattlePi, Cape Town Bussiness News, etc. They are not yet used in this paper (perhaps editors can include them). Dekisugi (talk) 07:39, 8 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep. I'm changing my vote to keep. However, I added a bias tag to the article. -- MQ Duck 08:41, 8 May 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.