Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Redbox Movie Awards (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 09:52, 20 January 2018 (UTC)

Redbox Movie Awards
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Was previously nominated for deletion a few years ago resulting in no consensus. I think its time to revisit. That discussion was flooded with SPA accounts who did not make policy arguments to keep. As stated in the previous discussion, this is not a notable award and does not meet WP:GNG. Also it seems that redbox no longer issues this "award" as the most recent mention of it I can find was from 2013. I know a merge was mentioned as a possibility in the previous discussion, but I really don't see anything worth keeping here since it only existed for two or three years. Keeping everything here would certainly create WP:UNDUE in the Redbox article. Rusf10 (talk) 01:05, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Baby miss  fortune 03:40, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Baby miss  fortune 03:41, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   09:24, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete Abandoned honor with no trophy based on proprietary information, and without the SPAs polluting this nom and four years out, that's even more clear now (I'm surprised we didn't strike those votes in the first nom).  Nate  • ( chatter ) 18:02, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete Redbox's self-promotional "awards" sourced entirely to either non-reliable or non-independent sources. No possibility of passing WP:GNG or any applicable SNG. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 00:23, 18 January 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.