Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Redbridge International Academy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Primary policies and guidelines cited for deletion: WP:V, WP:N, WP:SCHOOL (WP:ORG). No policies or guidelines cited as rationale for retention. slakr \ talk / 21:19, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

Redbridge International Academy

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unreffed article on a school only established last year. Notability very questionable - almost A7 material. Also some suspicion of creation by a paid editor. Andy Dingley (talk) 15:27, 16 December 2014 (UTC)


 * comment Red Bridge International Academy was WP:CSD deleted a month ago. This article was recreated a few hours later. Andy Dingley (talk) 15:28, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:19, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:19, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * Keep as a secondary school per longstanding precedent and consensus. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:49, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Rcsprinter123    (indicate)  @ 21:51, 22 December 2014 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * Weak delete WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES does show a history of secondary schools being kept at AfD, but it is a bit different with articles on newly-created schools where it is WP:TOOSOON. Essentially WP:Notability (high schools) still need to meet WP:ORG or WP:GNG, and this doesn't. I would redirect to school district or similar page, but this is orphaned and has no obvious redirect target. Boleyn (talk) 10:35, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, - Fim atic  (talk &#124; contribs) 18:33, 31 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete - I know the standards for schools are meant to be lower, but I'm having a difficult time seeing how this would even pass WP:V. NickCT (talk) 19:21, 31 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete as no evidence of notability, Whilst most have been kept per SCHOOLOUTCOMES those generally had some form of notability ..... but this doesn't ... – Davey 2010 Merry Xmas / Happy New Year 22:00, 31 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Very weak keep It is very soon, considering the school was only opened on June 8, 2013. However, it is a secondary school, which has a history of being kept, and I'm finding a couple mentions of it that aren't on the school's own website or facebook page; although they look to be very promotional in nature.  Also found a parent's review, and a very angry parent. These seem to verify that the school at least exists. However, they aren't exactly reliable sources to establish notability.  So, yeah, I'm saying keep just because it's a secondary school, but it's a weak keep. ~  ONUnicorn (Talk problem solving 22:11, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.