Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Redbridge foyer


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Wizardman 19:52, 22 December 2009 (UTC)

Redbridge foyer

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  AfD statistics)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 00:48, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Non-notable building. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 03:33, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.
 * Keep. I added some references. The construction technique described at http://www.building.co.uk/story.asp?storycode=1012411 is notable in itself. - Eastmain (talk) 06:48, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge somewhere. My suggestion would be to create a stub for East Thames Housing and put the encyclopaedic information there. If that's not an option, my preference is delete - the construction technique alone warrants, at the most, a mention in an article about this construction technique. Chris Neville-Smith (talk) 10:21, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. The Foyer setup is entirely notable, and this is a child of that idea.  It is a thousand times more encyclopediac than some dismal country and western singer, and WP is knee deep in them.--Brunnian (talk) 14:43, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
 * WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS Aditya Ex Machina  08:47, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
 * To answer above comment, the foyer setup may or not be notable, but being a "child" of a notable idea isn't notable in itself. At the most that would get this a mention in the article about the Foyer setup. See WP:NOTINHERITED. Chris Neville-Smith (talk) 09:57, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, I don't quite see that the mention of construction saves this. Geschichte (talk) 18:34, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.