Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Redcoats and Revolutionaries


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was 'Draftify'. Vanamonde (Talk) 17:38, 26 September 2020 (UTC)

Redcoats and Revolutionaries

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails to meet WP:NORG guidelines. While references are given, they are mostly passing mentions, or are by members themselves. Some coverage of events they appeared at but not WP:significant coverage. noq (talk) 08:23, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 11:56, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 11:56, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 11:56, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 13:58, 16 September 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete: Seems to fail NORG. Lots of sources but they are mentions in passing or plain unreliable (Facebook etc.). Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 03:35, 18 September 2020 (UTC)


 * Draftify: Rather than delete, I request it is moved into the project draft-space as I think it will be possible to improve in the near future. Blaene (talk) 08:16, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Draftify article fails GNG and NORG. But since the author requested to work on it in draftspace, its worth giving them the opportunity.  // Timothy ::  talk  01:16, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete or draftify -- I find it very hard to believe that a society with under 50 members is WP-notable. It might appear in a list of historical re-enactment groups with a link to its own website, but I doubt it would ever be able to get over the notability barrier.  Peterkingiron (talk) 15:09, 26 September 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.