Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reddcoin (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. j⚛e deckertalk 16:10, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

Reddcoin
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article was deleted in the past for sparse sourcing, promotional content and failure of WP:GNG. The article is now back, but it does not appear to have been improved since the last deletion discussion. It contains only 3 sources of dubious reliability: one of them is a forum post and two are blog entries on ForexMinute and CryptocoinsNews. The author of the CryptocoinsNews article admits to owning a "small amount" of Reddcoin, so they might not be considered an independent source. Breadblade (talk) 15:06, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2014 September 8.  — cyberbot I  Notify Online 15:21, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Strong delete per nom. Forum posts and cryptoblogs aren't reliable sources. Citation Needed  &#x007C;  He cites it for free.  21:56, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:54, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:55, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:55, 9 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 01:34, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  D u s t i *Let's talk!* 03:45, 23 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete Fails WP:CORP. The article does not provide coverage from independent reliable sources, and I could find no coverage in a search. Not surprising since the company is less than a year old. --MelanieN (talk) 20:31, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.