Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Redemption (Ryan Drake 1)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Black Kite (talk) 08:45, 8 July 2012 (UTC)

Redemption (Ryan Drake 1)

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

New book by new author. No indication of meeting notability criteria at WP:NBOOK. Unreferenced and nothign significant found on google. noq (talk) 14:17, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 15:27, 30 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete Not notable. Article is also completely unencyclopedic (plot only). And I'm not convinced that this re-created article has addressed the copyvio problems adequately. --Guillaume2303 (talk) 16:20, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - A WorldCat search shows only 7 copies of this book in libraries worldwide, which immediately fails the absolute minimum requirements for a Wikipedia article on a book. This may change as time goes on, but for now it's an immediate must-delete, per WP:NBOOK's threshold standards. Should the book ever get copies in a substantive number of libraries then we can start checking other book notability guidelines, and if the book then passes, an article can be recreated. In the meantime we are not a WP:CRYSTAL ball about future notability. DreamGuy (talk) 16:17, 7 July 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.