Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Redesdale Studios


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. MuZemike 19:40, 5 October 2009 (UTC)

Redesdale Studios

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable recording studio. Just because one or two people of marginal notability worked there doesn't make it inherently notable. Zero reliable sources to establish notability have been provided. &lt;&gt;Multi-Xfer&lt;&gt; (talk) 18:04, 14 September 2009 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:05, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  -- Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:50, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NW ( Talk ) 01:06, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep - It seems much more than one or two people, and of less than marginal notability. The article would benefit however of some stronger indication of the studio notability itself. --Cyclopia (talk) 00:37, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - Notability for the studio would be established with reliable sources covering. Perhaps some music industry magazine might have featured it.  But if that has happened, then I couldn't find it.  All I can find are credit listings on recordings. -- Whpq (talk) 20:31, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Keep - Assuming the information in the article is factual, it provides coverage of a topic likely to be discussed on a wide number of music-related pages and in that sense helps provide context for genuine research. - DustFormsWords (talk) 04:48, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.