Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Redfield & Wilton Strategies


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  01:35, 25 May 2021 (UTC)

Redfield & Wilton Strategies

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Firm fails WP:CORP.  Dewritech (talk)  16:38, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  Dewritech  (talk)  16:38, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:59, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep Most other UK polling firms have Wikipedia pages such as Savanta ComRes - not sure why that should warrant a page if Redfield & Wilton Strategies doesn't? Happy to have some clarification though. Mattftom (talk) 23:32, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - the fact that other stuff exists doesn't bear on notability: the question is whether there's significant coverage in reliable secondary sources. All I'm seeing is single-sentence trivial mentions, which don't cut it. If in-depth coverage about the company itself is found, I'm glad to reëvaluate, but my searches aren't yielding anything. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 05:21, 16 May 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 02:26, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Agree on failure of WP:CORP, coverage of a survey conducted by a company does not confer notability on the surveying company. And Savanta, Comres et all, even if we set WP:ITEXISTS aside (which we do not) have all been around longer than under a year! Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 13:44, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:NCORP. Surely the corporation existed, but nothing that is WP:SIGCOV is provided. I am sure they had done some work, but none of them are notable enough for inclusion to Wikipedia.SunDawn (talk) 09:03, 19 May 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.