Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Redhill (communications agency)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 05:07, 12 July 2022 (UTC)

Redhill (communications agency)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Promo page by paid editor with declared COI, no evidence of notability, links are all PR sites and paid ads. Previously speedied. JamesG5 (talk) 06:50, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Singapore. Shellwood (talk) 08:11, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete No evidence of notability, from either the sources in the article or elsewhere. Balon Greyjoy (talk) 11:40, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete And should have been speedied again. SALT this time. Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 14:20, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete:Fails GNG. Alphaonekannan (talk) 03:07, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete and salt. Cites primary sources and routine business news only, non-SIGCOV. Self-promotion, does not meet NCORP 2406:3003:2077:1E60:C998:20C6:8CCF:5730 (talk) 12:19, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete: A WP:COI article summarising a PR agency's area of operation. Notability is not inherited from clients and inclusion in fastest-growing lists are regarded as trivial coverage at WP:CORPDEPTH. A company going about its business, and acquiring other sector firms, but I am not seeing evidence of attained notability. AllyD (talk) 07:09, 10 July 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.