Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Redigenous

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 05:52, 3 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Redigenous
Neologism dicdef. One google hit and it's us. Delete neologism. -- Cyrius|✎ 02:36, 24 Mar 2005 (UTC)


 * Not even worthy of Wiktionary. Delete. BLANKFAZE | (&#1095;&#1090;&#1086;??) 04:02, 24 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, what they said. -- Infrogmation 17:34, 26 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete concur neologism Fawcett5 03:45, 29 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, Unless this has happened. Then rewrite with example.

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.