Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Redirectionalism


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. v/r - TP 19:46, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

Redirectionalism

 * – ( View AfD View log )

No evidence that it meets the WP:Notability criteria per WP:GNG. Sole source is a 2010 self-published book by one Donald Perry, the creator of the article. WP:COI is not a reason for deletion, but searching for the term with "-Perry" returns only 521 GHITS, 6 of which are about sexual redirectionalism, a completely unrelated term. Nearly all mentions of the term online are sales pages for the book, with no mention in WP:Reliable sources online. Proposed deletion contested without comment by the article's creator. Gurt Posh (talk) 09:20, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions.  —Gurt Posh (talk) 09:21, 29 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:MADEUP. StAnselm (talk) 10:04, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Redirect to... Just kidding. Delete as inarticulate and/or promotional companion to NN book. Jclemens (talk) 05:11, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.