Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Redline Communications Group


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 03:57, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

Redline Communications Group

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

promotional article, no clear notability. List of non notable member of the BOD is characteristic. Customer base listings are deceptive because they don;t indicate how much the product is actually used. Refs seem essentially Press releases.  DGG ( talk ) 02:08, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions.  Jinkinson   talk to me   What did he do now?  03:12, 14 December 2013 (UTC)


 * While the page is well written and contains important information, It lacks citation and is clearly not very important. I suggest improvement, otherwise Delete might be the easiest option. I can't really choose between keep and delete. --MrRatermat2 (talk) 13:39, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:05, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:05, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:05, 14 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete Commercial spam full of corporate flim-flam. Xxanthippe (talk) 05:53, 18 December 2013 (UTC).
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.