Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Redneck Rampage Rides Again


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Early closure per WP:Speedy keep, criteria #1 - "The nominator withdraws the nomination or fails to advance any argument for deletion or redirection—perhaps only proposing an alternative action such as moving or merging—and no one other than the nominator recommends that the page be deleted or redirected." (non-admin closure) DannyS712 (talk) 21:35, 9 November 2019 (UTC)

Redneck Rampage Rides Again

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This game is a sequel to Redneck Rampage, which is a notable game. However, no notable coverage of this game seems to exist. Appears to be a candidate for deletion with a possible redirect and token text on the Redneck Rampage page Hog Farm (talk) 04:30, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Withdrawn by nominator Addition of several good refs by Jovanmilic97 and more content renders this page worthy of a stand-alone article. Hog Farm (talk) 18:52, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 07:23, 9 November 2019 (UTC)


 * Merge with Redneck Rampage. This is only a brief article, and a merge should not prove difficult. The article on Redneck Rampage already has a sub-section on spin-offs of the game. Vorbee (talk) 08:41, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep I have expanded the article a bit with a lot of reliable WP:SIGCOV references that either meet WP:VG/RS or are newspapers/magazines (reviews from Computer Games Magazine, Computer Gaming World, GameSpot, Gamezilla, PC PowerPlay, PC Accelerator and Svet Kompjutera, with coverage in newspapers like The Gazette (Cedar Rapids), The Philadelphia Inquirer, The Tampa Tribune and CMJ New Music Monthly). There are even more reviews in foreign language. Easily meets WP:GNG, which requires multiple independent significant coverage in reliable sources. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 10:39, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep, obviously - awesome work, thanks Jovanmilic97! BOZ (talk) 16:20, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep the number of dedicated RS reviews alone is enough in itself to meet the WP:GNG. Sergecross73   msg me  18:30, 9 November 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.