Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Redoxon


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) Tim Song (talk) 00:03, 26 November 2009 (UTC)

Redoxon

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Contested PROD. No known citations that support the significance of the subject. causa sui ×  00:09, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - per this ref that states, "Redoxon is the brand name of the first artificially synthesized Vitamin c to be sold to the public." or this one that says, "Roche proudly unveiled Redoxen in 1934, the first mass-manufactured synthetic vitamin in history." -  Marcusmax  ( speak ) 00:36, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Redoxon is a huge brand in Europe and Asia. -- Fuzheado | Talk 09:43, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep The article definitely needs rescuing, particularly since the text "Redoxon is the brand name of the first artificially synthesised Vitamin C to be sold to the public" makes it sound like this is a new product being promoted by Roche. As Marcus points out, it was introduced in 1934 .  The article doesn't do justice to the importance of synthesizing ascorbic acid Vitamin C in a form where 1000 mg could be put into one pill, but this was one of the original vitamin supplements.  Mandsford (talk) 16:33, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment. The article needs better sources in order to be kept / demonstrate notability of the subject.  JBsupreme (talk) 17:10, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Evidently notable. Colonel Warden (talk) 21:17, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep It clearly states its "the first artificially synthesised ascorbic acid (Vitamin C)". That makes it notable.  Nothing else is needed.   D r e a m Focus  00:55, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep: Passes WP:N. Joe Chill (talk) 02:18, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Snow keep per all the above.--Epeefleche (talk) 01:30, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.