Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Redshirts (song)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) buffbills7701 17:27, 9 February 2014 (UTC)

Redshirts (song)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

There are no citations to prove notability. It was not released as a single. Vanjagenije (talk) 00:31, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  Jinkinson   talk to me  02:23, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:27, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Weak keep, added two references, more are found if I search.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:47, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep It was released as a single, actually -- it had to be as it was not attached to an album at the time of its released. Moreover, it's the song associated with (and written specifically as a theme song for) a Hugo-winning novel, which so far as I know is the first time that's happened. That's reasonably notable. With that said, if the article is kept, it should have the song's correct title: "Redshirt," not "Redshirts". Caveat: I do not hold an unbiased opinion, here. Scalzi (talk) 18:34, 25 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Stifle (talk) 17:46, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Unsure - may we have some more time to research? Bearian (talk) 21:28, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 01:02, 2 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Merge to novel article - no evidence given of standalone notability, but does appear noteworthy enough for a mention there. -- SarekOfVulcan (talk) 02:01, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Weak keep, open to Merge option Seems to meet minimum notability requirements. Because there doesn't seem to be much here it could be mentioned on the novels article or in the article of the singers subject.LM2000 (talk) 02:08, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.