Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Redstar2000 (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. j⚛e deckertalk 00:25, 11 November 2014 (UTC)

Redstar2000
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Google returns 81 results on "Redstar2000". None of the given sources are reliable sources. All are from within the Marxist community. While he may be well known in the limited context of the Marxist community, he has zero notability outside of that community. First AfD would almost certain ended in delete had anybody ever bothered to close and decide it ten years ago. Delete for lack of demonstrated notability. Safiel (talk) 04:35, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete A minor Marxist/anarchist figure who fails WP:POLITICIAN and the General notability guideline. Cullen328  Let's discuss it  04:57, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:07, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:07, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:08, 3 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete Lacks the significant independent coverage required to meet the GNG. 131.118.229.17 (talk) 20:01, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. Virtually all of the sourcing here is of the primary variety, with little to no reliable source coverage to confer notability under any of our inclusion rules. Bearcat (talk) 21:48, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment Even a message board conversation is cited in this article. -Xcuref1endx (talk) 19:31, 5 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete nothing to add from what has been stated above. -Xcuref1endx (talk) 22:20, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.