Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Redteam


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy delete. G12, confirmed copyright violation Mgm|(talk) 18:14, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

Redteam

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This group may not have achieved sufficient notability for inclusion in Wikipedia. The article is also written by a representative of the group, and written in the first-person narrative style (note the use of the word 'we'). Richard Cavell (talk) 02:30, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete until it is noticed by the mainstream, which might not happen since the team seems to be a bit secretive. Northwestgnome (talk) 03:59, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete--a personal project page with no notability asserted or established. Google gave me nothing. Drmies (talk) 05:00, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete and redirect to Red Team as an alternate spelling. 76.66.195.190 (talk) 05:52, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as CSD G11 - blatant advertising. The article is also marked as copyright on the website from which it is a verbatim copy, and there is no evidence of permission. Due to the copyright problem, I've marked it as a copyright violation. The revision prior to mine is located here. – Toon (talk)  15:02, 28 December 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.