Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Redtone


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy delete. G12  Ron h jones (Talk) 00:07, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

Redtone

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I tagged this article with for 2 reasons, the article is somewhat promotional and has some sentences in inappropriate tense, and an article of this size cannot be held up by just 2 citations. These issues are borderline enough for me not to put a DB-A7-G11 double-bomb on the article, so I did this instead. Note: This is my first afd nomin., so if I am not right please correct me. Passengerpigeon (talk) 13:07, 24 November 2012 (UTC)

Ok, should I remove the AFD and put a cleanup tag there instead? Passengerpigeon (talk) 00:01, 25 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment: Just for your knowledge, of the two reasons you list, one surely makes no sense. That "the article is somewhat promotional and has some sentences in inappropriate tense" is definitely NOT a reason to go to AfD, let alone speedy deletion. AfD is not cleanup, and our deletion policy tells us that if an article can be fixed by editing, then we must fix it, not delete it. Please remember that. I'll have a look at notability. -- Cycl o pia talk  21:56, 24 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment: I can find very little on Google Books/News in English language (this is the only significant), but I suspect a Malaysian-language search could give a different result. -- Cycl o pia talk  22:02, 24 November 2012 (UTC)
 * I don't know if removing the AFD is the right thing to do -after all, there are indeed sourcing/notability problems. I just wanted to make it clear that style issues are never, ever a reason to delete anything. -- Cycl o pia talk  10:03, 25 November 2012 (UTC)

Ok, I understand now. Passengerpigeon (talk) 10:47, 25 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete G12. The nominator's concerns come from blatant copyright infringement. The article was copied two of the companies websites and a news article. So tagged. • Gene93k (talk) 00:05, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.