Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Redundant Arrays of Hybrid Disks (RAHD)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Delete.  Jerry  talk ¤ count/logs 19:06, 10 August 2008 (UTC)

Redundant Arrays of Hybrid Disks (RAHD)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Contested prod. Only one source. seemingly non-notable subject of one paper. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 11:54, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete or Merge into RAID article, as subject doesn't seem notable enough for it's own article. --Xagent86 (Talk | contribs) 13:00, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. The only references I can find (including the one in the article) refer to conference proceedings. In general, such sources could be very borderline for WP:RS as many conference do not have a rigorous vetting process. The absence of third party sources is a result of this being a newly developed concept which is still very much in the scholarly realm. No useful applications have, as of yet, been implemented and until that happens this does not warrant an article. Also the articles creator, UserFrankwang (Frank Zhigang Wang), is the primary author of the sole reference. While there is no doubt that he is acting in good faith, there may be an argument (bearing in mind that the reference is a conference proceedings) for WP:SPS or even WP:OR. THEN WHO WAS PHONE? (talk) 06:59, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Similar to the now-deleted Redundant Arrays of Independent Filesystems and Redundant Arrays of Inexpensive Servers (all still linked in the See Also: of RAID), this seems to be an attempt to create interest in a project that has no independent verification.--HidariMigi (talk) 15:35, 10 August 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.