Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Redundant power system


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. NSLE ( T + C + CVU ) 03:18, 22 December 2005 (UTC)

Redundant power system
This page just explains the significance of the color of a LED on a certain model of Cisco switch. Wikipedia is not an instruction manual. It is possible that a useful article could be written on this topic, but a new article could just as easily be written from scratch. ManoaChild 00:45, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete below the radar of Wikibooks. Durova 01:14, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. As far as I can tell, this is a few lines from an instruction manual.  Jtmichcock 01:19, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Alr 01:30, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, per nom Tom Harrison (talk) 04:05, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. This could even be a copyvio. xaosflux  Talk  / CVU  04:19, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Completely useless.  novacatz 10:15, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete. It's written so poorly that it is nearly nonsense. --Descendall 23:22, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Unverifiable, possible copyvio Jcuk 23:40, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. -- JJay 19:40, 20 December 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.